Source review
Confirm scope, accuracy, formats, coordinates and intended use.
Capabilities
Production organized around a usable result
Source data, accuracy and intended use define the workflow. These capabilities can be combined without forcing the project into a fixed package.
Industrial equipment
Housings, interfaces, piping and critical internal components reconstructed from drawings and images.
Buildings and interiors
Floors, rooms, facades, MEP elements and major fixtures organized for display and operations.
High-poly and low-poly
Detailed source meshes, clean retopology, normal baking and production-ready real-time assets.
Material and texture work
Consistent PBR materials with controlled channels, resolutions and reuse.
Delivery Standard
Acceptance criteria before delivery
Specific values depend on the source data and target environment. Applicable criteria are agreed at the start instead of relying on vague quality labels.
| Level of detail | LOD defined by viewing distance, interaction requirements and target device |
|---|---|
| Topology | Polygon count, normals, UVs, material slots and editability |
| Object hierarchy | Buildings, floors, systems, equipment or components organized for retrieval |
| Textures | Base Color, Normal, Roughness, Metallic and other agreed channels |
| Engine fit | Budgets and variants prepared for browser, desktop or mobile use |
| Review workflow | Milestone previews, feedback revisions and final file validation |
Workflow
Approve a pilot before batch production
A representative pilot validates source quality, accuracy, visual language, hierarchy and performance early in the project.
Pilot approval
Lock hierarchy, detail, materials and performance on a representative asset.
Batch production
Model, review and preview assets against the agreed manifest.
Final validation
Verify files, versions, hierarchy, performance and delivery notes.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
How does manual modeling differ from automated reconstruction?
Automated methods cover large real-world areas quickly. Manual modeling is better when the asset needs interpreted structure, clean topology, a controlled hierarchy or intentional visual detail. Hybrid workflows are common.
Is manual modeling always more detailed?
No. Its main advantage is control. Detail is invested where it supports identification, interaction, accuracy or appearance.
Can you work from incomplete drawings?
Yes. Confirmed and inferred areas are separated during review so assumptions are not presented as verified geometry.
Can you produce low-poly assets?
Yes. We can deliver low-poly models, LOD variants, optimized UVs, texture atlases and engine-specific lightweight assets.